PEER Review

A Publication of the Parents Engaged in Education Reform Project

at the Federation for Children with Special Needs

Volume 2, Issue 1---October 1996


In This Issue....


PEER's First Teleconference a Success!

On Wednesday, September 25, 1996, the Parents Engaged in Education Reform (PEER) Project hosted its first teleconference, "The Importance of Parent Involvement in Education Reform at the National, State and Local Levels." Presenters for this teleconference were Dr. Robert Audette of the University of North Carolina at Charlotte and Ms. Barbara Buswell, Co-Director of the PEAK Parent Center in Colorado; Glenn Gabbard, Director of the PEER Project, moderated the call. The first half of the call was devoted to presentations by Dr. Audette and Ms. Buswell; the second half offered participants an opportunity to have their questions answered. Dr. Audette and Ms. Buswell discussed the "map" on which education reform takes place: the history of education reform; different target areas of reform which need to be addressed; and, finally the relationship of the information presented to the PTI's and the families which they serve. Dr. Audette opened by commenting on the timeliness of the teleconference in light of the recent attack on IDEA by Congress. The assault on special education laws right now is part of the reason that parents of children with special needs need to be involved in school reform and restructuring efforts at all levels.

HISTORY OF SCHOOL REFORM

Dr. Audette offered a brief overview of the history of school reform by answering the following four questions:

1. "Whom should we teach?"
According to Dr. Audette, school reform has always been about "who." Up to the middle of the nineteenth century, children with special needs were not included in the list of individuals who were going to receive the services of public education. Right now the "who" has been focused on children of illegal immigrants. Every time there is a question about or criticism of public schools, one of the first questions as to "why," goes back to "Who are the kids that we are providing services for?" Parents of children with special needs have been a large part of the education reform movement. Inclusion and due process are results of reform.

2. "What should we teach?"
This issue has changed considerably over time and is primarily driven by the economy (e.g., the shift from an agricultural economy to an industrial one) and the state of our national security. In addition, new technologies are expanding what schools are able to offer.

3. "Who will teach them?"
What are the qualifications of teachers? Even within special education, there is an array of views (e.g., the differing views of children who specialize in teaching children with mental retardation and teachers of children with learning disabilities.)

4. "How will we pay for it?"
The cost of special education has been an issue for a long time. Parents of children with special needs have been very effective in getting the services they need, but the cost has been proportionately so high that other parents now think that a backlash has been created. To prevent this backlash, it is important that parents get involved in the battle for good quality public schools for all children; if not, they may risk everything they won or a large portion of it.

School Reform as Part of Major Systemic Reform
Glenn Gabbard emphasized that participants need to keep in mind that school reform is one part of the major systemic reforms taking place (health care reform, welfare reform). It is important to understand how other reform movements are evolving as well and how they all relate to one another.

TARGET AREAS OF REFORM

In an effort to get at the heart of what school reform means, Ms. Buswell explained the target areas of reform by explaining issues relating to standards, assessment, curriculum, and local control and authority.

Standards
The goal of standards-based reform is to raise the expectations for all kids--both with and without special needs. Ms. Buswell addressed the three types of standards: content standards, performance standards and opportunity-to-learn standards.

  1. Content standards relate to learning issues for students, i.e., what we want kids to learn, what we think is important for them to know.
  2. Performance standards also relate to learning issues for students. They measure how students are able to show what they know, what they learned, and what they can do.
  3. Opportunity-to-learn standards relate to the teaching issues and processes that will enhance the students' learning. They are the things that have to happen in order for students to learn.

Assessment and Curriculum
Assessments identify what kids know. Ms. Buswell addressed the importance of developing alternative ways of assessing kids (such as portfolio assessment and authentic assessment) instead of the traditional ways that have been used for so many years. In terms of curriculum issues, Ms. Buswell emphasized the need to develop exciting curriculums for teaching all kids that would help all kids in a classroom not just in a certain group.

Local Control
At the local level, school reform has taken various forms including the emergence of a home schooling movement and the reemergence of private schools. Additionally, school reform issues at the local level tend to be more passionate, more child-specific than at the state or national levels. It is the level where you typically get the most one issue candidtates, for instance. Parents need to be actively involved at this level especially.

PTI INVOLVEMENT

PTI's can get involved in school reform efforts in two ways. First, they can provide information to parents about the impact of school reform on children with special needs. Second, they can encourage parents to get involved at the school, district and state levels. Young parents and all their "fresh" energy can be especially helpful. The topical teleconferences are being held as a way to provide ongoing information. All teleconferences will be recorded so that interested individuals can hear the presentation. If you would like a copy of the tape (for the cost of duplication), please contact the PEER Project at the Federation for further details. For a schedule of remaining teleconferences, see Upcoming Events.

Parents and School Reform

--From a Parent's Perspective

by Julia Landau, Massachusetts Advocacy Center

School reform and restructuring holds great promise for improving significantly the education of children with disabilities. Realizing the full potential of education reform, however, requires that parents of children with disabilities be actively involved in planning and implementing school reform policies and practices. The same parental expertise that was needed to make the promise of IDEA a reality for children with disabilities is also required to achieve the possibilities of school reform.

IDEA is, and will remain, the primary statute that parents of children with disabilities rely on to guarantee that their children receive an appropriate education. The IEP, LRE, parent participation, and due process provisions are key to assuring equity for children with disabilities. Although at first blush it may appear that school reform is another body of law and policy separate from IDEA, in fact, the two areas are inter-related.

School reform provides the opportunity to use the IEP to address issues of accountability for educational quality and educational outcomes. These are two areas which do not fall squarely within the scope of IDEA. In fact, IDEA regulations specifically state that "...:Part B of the Act does not require that any agency, teacher, or other person be held accountable if a child does not achieve the growth projected in the annual goals and objectives." (34 C.F.R. sec 300.349). IDEA coupled with education reform, then, provides an avenue to address directly issues of accountability for educational quality and educational outcomes.

How do education reform efforts make schools accountable for student learning? First, state, local, and/or national standards are established. These standards are used to determine educational outcomes--what all students are expected to learn. Second, the law requires that schools include children with all types of disabilities in their efforts to improve the quality of education. Finally, schools must demonstrate that children with and without disabilities "improve outcomes" and achieve "world class standards."

For children with disabilities, the Individualized Education Plan (IEP) becomes the vehicle for holding schools accountable to these newly established education reform standards and outcomes. Improved outcomes for children with disabilities will, in part, be demonstrated by progress made towards IEP goals which incorporate state standards. When IEP goals and objectives embody the high standards and outcomes established by education reform, parents can then use the IEP to ensure that the school system provides the special education and related services necessary. School reform, therefore, provides a mechanism by which schools are held accountable for the progress the students with IEPs make.

In addition to the exciting promise of school reform and restructuring, there is also, unfortunately, the potential that school reform will harm children with disabilities. If school reform efforts do not fully and equitably include students with disabilities, the end results could easily include increased marginalization, segregation, and lowered expectations for children with disabilities. In many cases, poorly implemented education reform could lead to denial of diplomas for students with disabilities. It is crucial, therefore, that parents provide input to ensure that school reform practices do not have detrimental effects on children with disabilities.

At its best, school reform, in concert with IDEA, offers the potential to hold schools accountable for providing quality education that will enable children with disabilities to achieve the outcomes and standards established for all children. At its worst, education reform will further segregation and decrease opportunities for children with disabilities. IDEA recognizes the expertise of parents, and the necessity of parental input at all levels of decision-making. It is this same expertise that will lead to successful implementation of school reform. Parents must continue to make sure their voices are heard as local and state school reform policies and practices are developed and implemented.

More on Brain Research

Interested in knowing more about brain research and its implications for all children, including those with disabilities? In her article "Brain Research and Ed Reform" in the September PEER Review, Marna Ares-Thompson wrote of important implications of brain research. The Education Commission of the States has just published "Bridging the Gap Between Neuroscience and Education," a summary of how schools and communities can use this exciting area of knowledge to better meet the needs of children. Though it will be awhile before the implications of this scientific research are applied to educational settings, the report recommends increased research moneys that would encourage collaboration between educators and scientists; a national study to develop recommendations for special education policy, based on existing research on children's learning processes; and the need to encourage higher education to think about how early childhood development is taught. For a short summary of the report, contact PEER via E-MAIL: peer@fcsn.org or drop us a line.

Cybercolumn

by Carolyn Romano

Viruses

Now that more and more of you are connecting to the Internet and perhaps downloading files from FTP sites or the World Wide Web* , you should familiarize yourself with the ins and outs of computer viruses. With a little foresight, you can protect your computer and files from the wide range of viruses which exist to annoy and harass computer users. What is a Computer Virus?
A computer virus is actually a computer program that is executed (run) on your computer and which can produce a variety of results. Some viruses are merely annoying. These viruses don't ruin data or prevent your computer from working properly; for example, they may just cause your computer to "beep" at various intervals just for the heck of it. Other viruses are destructive--they may prevent your computer from booting up or can erase your entire hard drive.

How do I get a computer virus?
A computer can only get a virus by running or opening an infected program or file or by booting your computer from an infected diskette. If you are online, you can only get a virus by downloading a file, and then opening/executing/running it. You can't get a virus just by connecting to the Internet.

Why do people create computer viruses?
People create viruses for a variety of reasons. Some viruses are created just for "fun" by computer hackers who merely wanted to see if they could create one. Other viruses are created by dissatisfied employees or religious and governmental fanatics. Some viruses are written to execute on a certain date to celebrate a certain holiday. On average, 100 new computer viruses are written every month.

Should I get an Anti-Virus program?
Yes!! The best time to install anti-virus software is before you get a virus. Anti-virus software will keep your system virus-free provided that you keep the program updated and that you check all new software and disks before using them in your computer. Your local computer store can recommend anti-virus software. Upgrades to keep your software current can usually be downloaded monthly from the Internet web site of the company that manufactures the software.

How can I protect my computer?

  1. Back-up your data.
  2. Use anti-virus software. Upgrade the software regularly.
  3. Scan all software and disks with your anti-virus software, including new software from a commercial company, prior to using them in your computer.
  4. Back-up your data.

Hot Websites

...on school reform and restructuring, and education, government ...on other useful resources

Resource Collection

The PEER Project is collecting information from organizations, agencies and projects actively involved in improving education and school services for all students. The emphasis of this collection is on
  1. parent-school collaboration and partnerships,
  2. parent involvement in school restructuring efforts,
  3. parent participation in improving equity and excellence in education, and
  4. community involvement in school reform and restructuring.
Please send us information on ones you know.

Publications

Darling-Hammond, L., Ancess, J., & Falk, B. (1995). Authentic assessment in action: Studies of schools and students at work. New York: Teachers College Press.

Fullan, M. G., & Hargreaves, A. (1996). What's worth fighting for in your school? New York: Teachers College Press.

Fullan, M. G., & Stiegelbauer, S. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.

Hess, G.A., Jr. (1995). Restructuring urban schools: A Chicago perspective. New York: Teachers College Press.

Check out the October 1996 edition of Educational Leadership for a series of articles on charter schools, vouchers, magnet schools, and home schooling. The effect of school choice and the resulting array of options that parents have in choosing a school are just being studied and discussed in detail. PEER will be focusing on charter schools and the implications for children with disabilities. Let us know if you would like more information or if you have information on school choice and its impact on children and families in your area. Recent research confirms that children learn more when parents and families are involved in their education. Surveys indicate that parents want guidance from schools on how to help their children learn more effectively. Studies also show that efforts by schools to enhance the home education environment can have a profound impact on school performance, namely in schools serving low-income and minority families. Reaching All Families: Creating Family-Friendly Schools is a 53-page on-line report offering 18 ways schools can reach out to all families. The full report is available at What is the school leader's role in sustaining school reform? And what "habits of mind and heart" help school leaders guide successful school change over time? These questions (and others) are answered by dozens of successful education leaders from across the country in "The Role of Leadership in Sustaining School Reform: Voices from the Field" (July 1996).

Join PEER's LISTSERV

It's never too late to join PEER's LISTSERV! The LISTSERV(an Internet e-mail-based discussion group) is targeted to anyone interested in discussing school reform and restructuring and its impact on students with disabilities. If you would like to subscribe to the LISTSERV (i.e., receive e-mail messages from others interested in the topic), send an e-mail message to peer@fcsn.org with the words Subscribe FirstName LastName in the body of the message. To post a message to the LISTSERV, send your thoughts to peer@fcsn.org, and your message will be distributed to the rest of the group.

Upcoming Events

1996-97 Teleconference Schedule

Nov. 20. School climate and community for students. Creating a school climate and community which works in a variety of ways to support quality and equal education for all students, including discipline procedures.

Dec. 11. School climate and community for parents. Creating a school climate and community that invites equal and active participation in real decision-making by parents of children with disabilities.

Jan. 22. Assessment. The importance of authentic assessment with respect to parents, students and educators within the framework of school reform and restructuring processes.

Feb. 19. Standards. Content, performance and opportunity-to-learn standards and their impact on the educational options for students with disabilities.

Mar. 19. Electronic communication. Electronic communication systems and information.

Apr. 16. School reform and young children. School reform issues and implications for young children with disabilities and their families.

May 21. Special education laws and education reform. Discussion on the relationship among Chapter 1, special education laws, bilingual education, Goals 2000, and school reform.

June 18. Urban schools. Education reform for students with disabilities in urban schools.

July 23. Finance. The impact of education reform efforts on issues of financing school services.

Aug. 20. Curriculum. How reforming schools impacts curriculum for students with disabilities, and the importance of curriculum reform to the process of change in educational resources, supports and systems.

The PEER Project encourages you to invite parents, parent leaders, parent trainers and professionals in your community who are interested in and working to reform and restructure educational options, supports and resources in your state and local community to listen to the teleconference with you. In addition, the audio-tape from each teleconference could be used in training workshops for parents and staff.


The PEER Project is at the Federation for Children with Special Needs, and is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs (H029K50208). Opinions or points of view do not necessarily represent those of the U.S. Education Department or Offices within it.

© 1996, Federation for Children with Special Needs, Boston, Massachusetts

Web Page by Carolyn Romano and John Sullivan

Last updated 2/20/97
URL: http://www.fcsn.org/peer/pr/pr2-2.htm